A Note from the Website Admins
We have received messages regarding personal stories published on this site, including one involving events at Mt. Juliet Christian Academy over 25 years ago. Some have asked why we are not redacting the names of the women involved.
We will not be redacting these names.
To do so would be to erase the very pattern that the public needs to see. The purpose of this platform is to illuminate the structure of manipulation that existed—specifically, the connection between Gregg’s original circle of male friends and the young women some of them may have groomed, several of whom they went on to marry. Obscuring the names of these women obscures the evidence of that grooming pipeline. It allows the architecture of the abuse to remain hidden.
Regarding the claim that this story prevents victims from coming forward:
We take any claim regarding the well-being of victims seriously. However, we must evaluate the many reasons victims have remained silent for decades—reasons that have nothing to do with this site and everything to do with the environment we are exposing.
People have not come forward for years because:
They were systematically isolated from peers and family.
They were told by authority figures that they would not be believed.
They faced threats of legal action, defamation suits, or financial ruin.
They endured spiritual abuse, being told that speaking out was “not forgiving” or was “against God’s will.”
They watched prior survivors be publicly smeared, shunned, or ostracized by the community.
These are the true barriers to disclosure. To suggest that a whistleblowing website—one that offers a platform for anonymous sharing and documented truth—is the primary obstacle preventing victims from speaking is a tactic we recognize all too well.
Our Policy:
If a person directly involved in this (or any) story contacts us with specific evidence explaining how our specific content is directly inhibiting them—or another named individual—from coming forward, we will take that into serious consideration. General complaints from third parties attempting to silence discourse on their behalf will not result in retractions.
We see the current push to redact names for what it is: a tactic of twisting the blame. It is an attempt to gaslight the public into believing that the exposure of wrongdoing is more harmful than the wrongdoing itself.
We know this group’s history. For decades, they have utilized victim-blaming to keep people silent. They contort details, weaponize religion, and threaten litigation to avoid accountability. They will not be permitted to blame a whistleblowing website for the silence they worked so hard to enforce.
This platform remains committed to providing a safe space for survivors to share their experiences. We will not be complicit in hiding the connections that define this pattern of abuse.
— The Site Admins